Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 03:38

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What is your review of viloi.com? (viloi.com review).
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
ADHD link to severe premenstrual disorder uncovered in women - Medical Xpress
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Thank you.
Chime, last valued at $25B, aims for $11B in upcoming IPO - TechCrunch
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
What’s next?
US tycoon pours $100mn into Trump crypto project after SEC reprieve - Financial Times
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
See the moon shine with famous red star Antares in the southern sky on June 9 - Space
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Why is it rare for someone to despise both the Democrats and Republicans?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Aussie firms Soul Patts and Brickworks' $9 billion merger sends their shares rocketing - CNBC
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Let’s just make it real clear: